Judging Guidelines
1. Outstanding Projects Award Criteria
- Relevance (20%)
- Does the entry fit the category entered into? Is it a “project” per se or just a One-off activity?
- Impact Objective (30%)
- Does the project have a ‘developmental’ impact objective (i.e. one that provides “benefits” (e.g., social economic, technological, etc.). Were the beneficiaries’ responses positive?
- Result/Record (30%)
- Did the project produce results as expected? Beyond expectations? If it is a long-running project, did it matter to the expected beneficiaries?
- Innovation (20%)
- Is the project innovative in the context of the country? Worthy of replication? Something “fresh?”
2. Outstanding CEO Award Criteria
- Status/Integrity (25%)
- Is the CEO known in the community? Reputation? Ethical standards?
- Leadership (25%)
- What kind of a leader is he/she? Is he/she well liked by the officers/staff? By the community?
- Performance (25%)
- Is his/her institution successful? Did his/her decision produce remarkable results for his/her institution? Did he/she enhance the institution’s financial health /image?
- Vision (25%)
- What kind of a vision does he/she have for his/her institution? Is his/her vision in line with the environment he/she operates?
3. Distinguished Person Award Criteria
- Stature/Integrity (30%)
- Is the person known/respected in the country as well as internationally? Other recognitions received?
- Lifetime Achievements (50%)
- What accomplishments did he/she have during his/her lifetime that merits recognition?
- Personal Advocacy (20%)
- What is his/her life’s philosophy? Advocacy?
4. Best Sustainability Report Criteria
- Disclosure of financial management and sustainability information (50%)
- Articulation of sustainable development agenda (20%)
- Clarity and readability of content (10%)
- Design and visual impact (10%)
- Overall uniqueness and innovativeness (10%)